Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41404491›Full record

ArticleAdvances in radiation oncology2026

Feasibility of Very High Cumulative Equivalent Dose in 2 Gy Fraction in Locally Advanced Central/Ultracentral Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer Treated With Conventional Chemoradiation Therapy and a Stereotactic Boost.

Anna Gueiderikh, Baptiste Lhomel, Renaud Schiappa, Médéric Barret, Victoria Ferrari, Arash O Naghavi, Bastien Chanoux, Pierre-Yves Bondiau, Jérôme Doyen

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in radiation oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06627738 (Locally Advanced NSCLC Treated With Radiochemotherapy), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06627738 phase2recruitingnot on this map

Locally Advanced NSCLC Treated With Radiochemotherapy: Phase 2 Study on the Value of a Stereotactic Boost

TypeinterventionalSponsorCentre Antoine LacassagneRan2025 to 2034Enrolled42ConditionsCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungArmsCyberknife irradiation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Anna GueiderikhDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, University of Côte d'Azur, Nice, France.
Baptiste LhomelDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, University of Côte d'Azur, Nice, France.
Renaud SchiappaDepartment of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Health Data, Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, Nice, France.
Médéric BarretDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, University of Côte d'Azur, Nice, France.
Victoria FerrariDepartment of Medical Oncology, Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, Nice, France.
Arash O NaghaviDepartment of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tempa, Florida, United States of America.
Bastien ChanouxDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, University of Côte d'Azur, Nice, France.
Pierre-Yves BondiauDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, University of Côte d'Azur, Nice, France.
Jérôme DoyenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, University of Côte d'Azur, Nice, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to evaluate the cumulative equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions (EQD2) to organs at risk and its potential correlation with toxicities in patients with locally advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer treated with very high mediastinal radiation therapy doses using mixed fractionation. Methods and Materials: Patients from a previously reported phase 1 trial (PMID: 29650404) were included (n = 26). They received a stereotactic boost (3 × 7-12 Gy) following chemoradiation therapy (cisplatin-based chemotherapy and 23 × 2 Gy using three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy). Seventeen treatment plans were available for dosimetric analysis. Doses delivered at each point of the planning computed tomography scan from each treatment phase were converted to EQD2 based on the α:β ratios, which are shown in asterisks following each converted dose. The 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy and stereotactic body radiation therapy plans were each converted to EQD2, and their summation was used to estimate the total dose delivered to organs at risk. Results: In the entire cohort (n = 26), 77% of tumors were ultracentral, 19% peripheral, and 4% central. We observed 1 grade 3 toxicity (bronchial stenosis/fibrosis), 1 grade 4 toxicity (esophagitis with fistula), and 1 grade 5 toxicity (fatal hemoptysis). Dosimetric evaluation of the proximal bronchovascular (PBV) tree and esophagus revealed no severe late toxicity with PBV tree D1cc < 150 Gy *2* and esophageal D1cc < 100 Gy *10*. Median maximal EQD2 D1cc for organs at risk were as follows: aorta, 84.3 Gy *3* (range, 53.3-190.6); pulmonary arteries, 136.9 Gy *3* (range, 47.2-232.3); superior vena cava, 70.6 Gy *3* (range, 16.2-192.8); pulmonary veins, 69.0 Gy *3* (range, 3.5-231); esophagus, 67.9 Gy *10* (range, 15.7-161); PBV tree, 153.4 Gy *2* (range, 20.3-235.9). Conclusions: The following preliminary dose constraints-PBV tree D1cc < 150 Gy *2* and esophageal D1cc < 100 Gy *10*-may be safe and are currently being prospectively evaluated in an ongoing phase 2 trial (NCT06627738). The correlation between toxicities and the degree of initial tumor infiltration of organs at risk requires further prospective evaluation.

Identifiers

PMID41404491
PMCPMC12703952

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.