ArticleFrontiers in neurology2025
Protocol for assessing functional impairments in patients with unilateral and bilateral vestibulopathy: a novel approach to evaluate the impact of vestibular loss in daily life setting.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessment of dynamic stability and identification of key tasks, inertial sensors, and parameters in patients with bilateral and unilateral vestibulopathy: investigation in a semi-standardized environment.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Characterization of head movement patterns in patients with bilateral and unilateral vestibulopathy during functional mobility tasks.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Current vestibular assessments typically focus on isolated reflex pathways, failing to reflect the integrative nature of balance control. Consequently, clinical results often do not align with patient-reported symptoms or functional limitations in daily life. Objective: To develop and present a comprehensive multimodal protocol for assessing functional impairments in patients with unilateral vestibulopathy (UV) and bilateral vestibulopathy (BV) using wearable sensors and ecologically valid daily-life tasks. Methods: We designed a protocol combining nine inertial measurement units (IMUs), eye-tracking glasses, and plantar pressure insoles to assess participants during 15 standardized tasks reflecting daily activities. Tasks were selected through literature review, validated questionnaires (DHI, VADL), and patient interviews. The protocol is conducted in a semi-naturalistic rehabilitation facility environment to maximize ecological validity while maintaining standardization. We tested feasibility with 60 participants (20 UV, 20 BV, 20 healthy controls). Protocol outcomes: The protocol successfully demonstrates feasibility across all sensor modalities and task categories. In this paper we describe the methodology used for task selection, the results of task performance in people with unilateral and bilateral vestibulopathy and healthy controls, and the sensor methodology (inertial measurement units, eye-tracking glasses, plantar pressure insoles). Analysis of sensor data will be presented in future papers. Conclusion: This protocol provides a patient-centered, ecologically valid framework for quantifying vestibular-related functional impairments beyond traditional laboratory settings. The methodology bridges the gap between clinical vestibular testing and lived patient experiences, enabling objective assessment of real-world mobility challenges for personalized rehabilitation and treatment monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.