Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41404453›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Anterior-Only Sacrocolpopexy Complicated by Obstructive Enterocele: Should Both Compartments Always Be Repaired?

Leandro Nobrega, Boris Schiltz, Jerome Mathis, Caroline Eggemann

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Leandro NobregaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Spitalzentrum Biel, Biel, CHE.
Boris SchiltzDepartment of General Surgery, Spitalzentrum Biel, Biel, CHE.
Jerome MathisDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Spitalzentrum Biel, Biel, CHE.
Caroline EggemannDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Spitalzentrum Biel, Biel, CHE.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sacrocolpopexy is widely regarded as the gold standard for apical prolapse repair, yet the extent of mesh placement remains debated. While some surgeons routinely place both anterior and posterior meshes, others favor a compartment-specific approach. We report the case of a 60-year-old woman with prior hysterectomy and anti-incontinence mesh surgery who underwent anterior-only robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy for apical and anterior prolapse. Six weeks later, she developed incomplete bowel emptying, pelvic pressure, and a posterior vaginal bulge. Examination revealed posterior compartment prolapse, and MRI defecography confirmed an obstructive enterocele with small bowel descent, rectocele, and intussusception. After multidisciplinary discussion, she underwent robot-assisted posterior sacrocolpopexy combined with rectopexy, including posterior mesh placement and Douglas closure. The postoperative course was uneventful, and symptoms resolved at the four-month follow-up. This case highlights obstructive enterocele as a rare but clinically significant complication of anterior-only sacrocolpopexy and underscores the need for individualized surgical planning and vigilance for postoperative bowel dysfunction, supporting a selective approach in which posterior support may be considered when posterior compartment weakness or bowel dysfunction is evident.

Indexed as

mesh repairobstructive enterocelepelvic organ prolapserectocelesacrocolpopexy

Identifiers

PMID41404453
PMCPMC12703543

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.