Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41404418›Full record

ArticleJournal of pharmacy & pharmaceutical sciences : a publication of the Canadian Society for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Societe canadienne des sciences pharmaceutiques2025

Reuse of unused medications: a cross-sectional study on public willingness and influencing factors.

Faten Alhomoud, Sakinah Alalwyat, Lama Alanzi, Farah Kais Alhomoud, Sarah Khayyat, Khalid A Alamer, Basmah Alfageh, Mohra Aladwani, Abdullah A Alhifany

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pharmacy & pharmaceutical sciences : a publication of the Canadian Society for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Societe canadienne des sciences pharmaceutiques, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Faten AlhomoudDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia.
Sakinah AlalwyatCollege of Pharmacy, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia.
Lama AlanziCollege of Pharmacy, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia.
Farah Kais AlhomoudDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia.
Sarah KhayyatDepartment of Pharmaceutical Practices, College of Pharmacy, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia.
Khalid A AlamerDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia.
Basmah AlfagehDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Mohra AladwaniDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Taif University, Taif, Saudi Arabia.
Abdullah A AlhifanyDepartment of Pharmaceutical Practices, College of Pharmacy, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Medication waste is a significant global concern with environmental, economic, and healthcare implications. In Saudi Arabia, approximately 25.8% of dispensed medications are wasted, resulting in an annual cost of $150 million. Re-dispensing unused medications has been proposed to reduce this waste; however, its feasibility depends on public acceptance, regulatory frameworks, and assurances of safety. This study aimed to assess the Saudi public's willingness to accept re-dispensed medications returned unused to pharmacies and to identify factors influencing this willingness. A descriptive cross-sectional survey was conducted online across Saudi Arabia. The questionnaire, adapted from a validated tool by McRae et al. McRae et al. (Pharmacy (Basel), 2021, 9(2): 77) and translated into Arabic, explored demographics, medication practices, storage and disposal, and attitudes towards medication waste and re-dispensing. The survey was distributed via social media. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 29, including chi-squared tests and binary logistic regression. A total of 405 participants completed the survey, primarily female (64%) and aged 25-44 years (43%). About 64% reported having unused medications at home, most commonly stored in bedrooms (55.1%) and kitchens (53.6%). Disposal practices included keeping medicines for future use (62.5%), discarding them with household waste (45.7%), sharing them with others (21.5%), and returning unused medications to a pharmacy (8.4%). Approximately 60% were willing to accept re-dispensed tablets and 55% capsules, whereas fewer accepted other dosage forms. Key factors influencing acceptance included pharmacist verification of quality and integrity (79.3%), informed consent (77.3%), expiry dates (77%), and intact packaging (74.8%). Most participants (68.1%) indicated they would return unused medicines if a re-dispensing program were implemented, and half (50.6%) believed all medications, not only expensive ones, should be considered. Significant predictors of willingness included age (P < 0.001), employment status (P = 0.004), regular prescription use (P = 0.046), and concern about waste (P < 0.001). Younger participants showed higher acceptance, while employed individuals, retirees, and regular medication users were more hesitant. The findings indicate cautious yet notable public support for medication re-dispensing in Saudi Arabia, particularly for oral solid dosage forms, provided rigorous safety measures are assured. Policymakers should consider these insights to guide initiatives aimed at reducing medication waste.

Indexed as

Pharmaceutical PreparationsAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSaudi ArabiaSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultPharmaceutical Preparationsmedicine re-dispensingmedicine reusemedicine wasterecycleunused medicine

Identifiers

PMID41404418
PMCPMC12702787

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.