Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41404379›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of nanomedicine2025

In vivo Testing of Nanotherapeutics for Osteosarcoma Treatment: Translational Challenges and Solutions.

Gabriele D'Anna, Endris Yibru Hanurry, Anna Piperno, Angela Scala

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of nanomedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Gabriele D'AnnaDepartment of Chemical, Biological, Pharmaceutical and Environmental Sciences, University of Messina, Messina, 98166, Italy.ORCID 0009-0002-0655-025X
Endris Yibru HanurryDepartment of Chemical, Biological, Pharmaceutical and Environmental Sciences, University of Messina, Messina, 98166, Italy.
Anna PipernoDepartment of Chemical, Biological, Pharmaceutical and Environmental Sciences, University of Messina, Messina, 98166, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6004-5196
Angela ScalaDepartment of Chemical, Biological, Pharmaceutical and Environmental Sciences, University of Messina, Messina, 98166, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2171-9033

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Osteosarcoma (OS) is a malignant bone tumor primarily affecting children and teenagers, characterized by aggressiveness and early metastasis especially to the lungs. OS management is complex and combined-modality therapy involving surgery, chemotherapy and immunotherapy is common. The standard care treatment utilizing doxorubicin, cisplatin, and high-dose methotrexate is a combination ("MAP") not changed in more than 40 years that often confronts incomplete tumor removal, recurrence, drug resistance, and severe side effects. Recent advancements in nano- and precision medicine have introduced tumor-targeted drug delivery strategies through multifunctional nanocarriers which aim to enhance therapeutic efficacy by preventing rapid clearance, prolonging circulation time and improving accumulation at tumor sites while minimizing adverse effects. Although many of these smart Nanotherapeutics are still at the preclinical stage, their unique properties make their promotion in OS clinical applications a challenge. Starting from an overview of the current approved OS therapies, this review reports a systematic analysis of in vivo studies published in the last decade that employ multifunctional nanosystems, drug delivery strategies and cutting-edge technologies in chemo-, immuno- and gene therapy for OS management providing an overview of the potential and challenges of these innovative treatment strategies. Our comprehensive literature analysis points out their certain antitumoral effects in OS preclinical models; however, overcoming translational bottlenecks remains a critical challenge, as promising preclinical findings often fail to translate into effective clinical therapies. Moreover, extended long-term observation in clinical studies is still required together with an in-depth understanding of the unique genetics and biology of OS, given the complex heterogeneity of the tumor microenvironment. By analyzing the limitations of conventional therapies, the latest advancements in nanotechnology alongside key bottlenecks in clinical translation of nanotherapeutics for OS, this review provides valuable insight into future directions, particularly for combination regimens, fostering progress in OS clinical research and supporting the development of innovative and personalized therapies.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsBone NeoplasmsOsteosarcomaAnimalsDrug Delivery SystemsGenetic TherapyHumansImmunotherapyNanomedicineNanoparticlesTranslational Research, BiomedicalAntineoplastic AgentsCDDPdoxorubicinhydrogelimmunogenic cell deathliposomenanoparticles

Identifiers

PMID41404379
PMCPMC12704517

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.