Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41404358›Full record

ArticleJournal of pain research2025

Chloroprocaine ED

Pengchong Lai, Xiyang Yang, Xuemei Yang, Qinghang Xuan, Yanwei Fang, Zhijiao He, Bingjun Chen, Guangfen Yin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pain research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Pengchong Lai *Section One, Department of Anesthesiology, Gaozhou People's Hospital, Gaozhou, Guangdong Province, 525200, People's Republic of China.
Xiyang Yang *Shanghai Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, Department of Cardiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, People's Republic of China.
Xuemei YangDepartment of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dali University, Dali, Yunnan Province, 671000, People's Republic of China.
Qinghang XuanDepartment of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dali University, Dali, Yunnan Province, 671000, People's Republic of China.
Yanwei FangDepartment of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dali University, Dali, Yunnan Province, 671000, People's Republic of China.
Zhijiao HeDepartment of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dali University, Dali, Yunnan Province, 671000, People's Republic of China.
Bingjun ChenDepartment of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dali University, Dali, Yunnan Province, 671000, People's Republic of China.
Guangfen YinDepartment of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dali University, Dali, Yunnan Province, 671000, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to estimate the median effective dose (ED Methods: First, apply a pressure bandage to the elbow of the patient's arm where the peripheral vein is accessible. Then, administer clonprocaine via intravenous injection into the dorsal hand vein while maintaining local pressure from the bandage to block venous return at the elbow for 30 seconds. The initial clonprocaine dose is set at 30mg with 1mg increments. If no injection pain occurs (negative response), reduce the dose by one step for the next patient until pain develops. If pain occurs (positive response), increase the dose by one step until pain subsides. The trial terminates when seven negative and positive responses are recorded, halting case enrollment. Using Probit probability regression analysis, calculate the median effective dose (ED50) and 95% effective dose (ED95) of clonprocaine for preventing propofol injection pain, along with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: A total of 35 patients completed the study. Of these, 27 reported no pain upon injection, while 8 experienced pain. Probit analysis yielded an ED Conclusion: Intravenous CP, administered at doses of 11.554 mg and 13.085 mg, achieved 50% and 95% efficacy, respectively, in preventing pain associated with propofol injection. These doses were associated with effective attenuation of nociceptive responses, reduced propofol requirements, absence of significant adverse effects, and preservation of hemodynamic stability, thereby supporting the use of CP in enhancing patient comfort during anesthetic induction.

Indexed as

chloroprocaineED50ED95propofol injection painsequential method

Identifiers

PMID41404358
PMCPMC12703034

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.