ArticleJournal of pain research2025
Chloroprocaine ED
Article in Journal of pain research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to estimate the median effective dose (ED Methods: First, apply a pressure bandage to the elbow of the patient's arm where the peripheral vein is accessible. Then, administer clonprocaine via intravenous injection into the dorsal hand vein while maintaining local pressure from the bandage to block venous return at the elbow for 30 seconds. The initial clonprocaine dose is set at 30mg with 1mg increments. If no injection pain occurs (negative response), reduce the dose by one step for the next patient until pain develops. If pain occurs (positive response), increase the dose by one step until pain subsides. The trial terminates when seven negative and positive responses are recorded, halting case enrollment. Using Probit probability regression analysis, calculate the median effective dose (ED50) and 95% effective dose (ED95) of clonprocaine for preventing propofol injection pain, along with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: A total of 35 patients completed the study. Of these, 27 reported no pain upon injection, while 8 experienced pain. Probit analysis yielded an ED Conclusion: Intravenous CP, administered at doses of 11.554 mg and 13.085 mg, achieved 50% and 95% efficacy, respectively, in preventing pain associated with propofol injection. These doses were associated with effective attenuation of nociceptive responses, reduced propofol requirements, absence of significant adverse effects, and preservation of hemodynamic stability, thereby supporting the use of CP in enhancing patient comfort during anesthetic induction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.