ArticleBone reports2025
Predictors of clinically meaningful bone mineral density gains with romosozumab: An explainable machine leaning analysis of a real-world cohort.
Article in Bone reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the real-world effectiveness of Romosozumab in postmenopausal women with severe osteoporosis and to identify baseline clinical and biochemical predictors of clinically meaningful bone mineral density (BMD) gains (≥10 %, used for exploratory classification) using an explainable machine-learning approach. Methods: We conducted a retrospective, observational multicentre study across seven hospitals in Castilla-La Mancha, Spain. Postmenopausal women aged ≥50 years who initiated romosozumab between May 2023 and November 2024 for severe osteoporosis or high fracture risk were included. Lumbar-spine, femoral-neck, and total-hip BMD were assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) at baseline and 12 months. Baseline biochemical variables included serum P1NP, CTX, PTH, vitamin D, calcium, phosphate, alkaline phosphatase, and creatinine. Predictors of a ≥ 10 % BMD gain were examined using elastic-net logistic regression combined with SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) for model interpretability. Results: Fifty-eight women were analysed (mean ± SD age 71.7 ± 10.0 years; BMI 26.1 ± 4.8 kg/m Conclusions: Romosozumab was effective and well-tolerated in routine clinical practice, yielding meaningful and site-specific gains in BMD. Explainable machine-learning analysis identified physiologically coherent and consistent clinical predictors of ≥10 % response.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.