Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41404354›Full record

ArticleLandscape and urban planning2024

Developing the Health Effect Assessment of Landscape (HEAL) Tool: Assessing the Health Effects of Community Greenspace Morphology Design on Non-Communicable Diseases.

Huaqing Wang, Louis G Tassinary, Galen D Newman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Landscape and urban planning, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Urban tree canopy fragmentation and child mortality in low- and middle-income countries.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Huaqing WangDepartment of Landscape Architecture and Environmental Planning, Utah State University, Logan, UT 84322, USA.
Louis G TassinarySchool of Performance, Visualization and Fine Arts, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA.
Galen D NewmanDepartment of Landscape Architecture and Urban Planning, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA.

Funding

Single cell, multi-parametric high throughput platform to classify endocrine disruptor potential of mixturesP42ES027704 · NIEHS · TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY · PI Efstratios Pistikopoulos · 2017 to 2026
$21.2M
NIEHS NIH HHS P42 ES027704
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neighborhood greenspace benefits health, yet few tools are available for estimating the health consequences of community greenspace design alternatives, especially prior to the implementation of a landscape design plan. Herein we present a machine learning based tool for predicting the prevalence of non-communicable diseases based on landscape design maps at the community scale. We achieve this based on data collected in five major metropolises in the United States. By using high-resolution satellite imagery and remote sensing technologies, landscape spatial design characteristics were extracted through spatial pattern analysis, allowing the measurement of verdancy, fragmentation, connectedness, aggregation, and shape of greenspaces. We established a model to estimate the prevalence of poor mental health, coronary heart disease, stroke, diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and physical inactivity at the census tract level by adopting a combination of random forest decision tree algorithm and spatial Gaussian process models. Model accuracy was found to be significantly higher than ordinary regression models. The model accounted for very high levels of variance in the specified morbidities; viz., poor mental health (97%), heart disease (93%), stroke (93%), diabetes (95%), COPD (94%), and physical inactivity (98%). This tool is implemented using a freely available programming language (R), and we offer the model accessible to the public. This tool enables urban planners and landscape designers to assess and compare the health effects of different greenspace design plans prior to implementation, thus providing policymakers and designers with evidence-rich alternatives during the health-promoting greenspace planning process.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceLandscape architectureMachine learningPublic healthUrban planning

Identifiers

PMID41404354
PMCPMC12705061

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.