ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2025
Comprehensive analysis of the flavor volatiles and quality characteristics of ginseng products via GC × GC-TOF-MS, aroma profiles and multivariate statistics.
Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Analysis of the Effect of Autoclaving on the Flavor of Fresh Ginseng Using Electronic Nose, HS-GC-IMS, and HS-SPME-GC-MS.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Utilization of Biomass Waste from Citrus Fruits for the Production of Essential Oils.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Identification of Key Aroma Compounds Associated with Olfactory Perception and Pleasantness in Processed Ginseng Products: Insights from GC-MS, Flavoromics, and Computational Modeling.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Indigenous knowledge and modern science: a comprehensive review of phytochemicals inFrontiers in nutrition · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: As a popular supplement in the world, ginseng occupies a prominent position in the health food industry. With the expansion of the consumer market, ginseng products have gained wider applications. Previous studies have mainly focused on the cultivation, chemical composition, functions and mechanisms of action of ginseng. Methods: To explore the differences of flavor quality characteristics of ginseng products, the volatile metabolites of seven products were evaluate from different growth years, growth environments, processing methods, and parts by GC × GC-ToF-MS, sensory evaluation and multivariate statistics. Results: The six-year red ginseng exhibited the highest diversity of volatile metabolites with 2,264 compounds identified, followed by ginseng flowers and ginseng under forest. Odour activity values showed that compounds such as 2,3-Butanedione, Pyrazine, and 2-methoxy-3-(1-methylethyl)-, enhanced the pleasant and buttery flavors of ginseng products. And ginseng flowers displayed more pronounced fruity and citrus flavor characteristics. Additionally, the differences of growing year, growing environment, processing methods and parts on flavor characteristics were analyzed by multivariate statistics. The flavor compounds in ginseng products with a low growth period mainly contribute to sweetness and fruity flavor. Ginseng products after steaming and boiling have more attractive sweet characteristics. The differences in the growth environment significantly affect flavor characteristics including sweetness, greenness, fruity, floral, bitter, herbal and waxy. Discussion: This study provided a vital reference for the establishment of a convenient detection and identification system linking ginseng raw materials, flavor characteristics, volatile compounds, and product quality control.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.