ArticleEFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority2025
Training in metagenomics-integrated risk assessment for food-borne pathogens in the Slovenian and Spanish meat chain (METAMEAT).
Article in EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Training in metagenomics-integrated risk assessment for food-borne pathogens in the Slovenian and Spanish meat chain (METAMEAT).EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Next-generation sequencing (NGS) has become an essential tool for antimicrobial resistance (AMR) surveillance, enabling comprehensive detection of AMR determinants in both bacterial isolates and complex microbial communities. Metagenomic sequencing enables culture-independent profiling of antimicrobial resistance genes (ARGs) in different environments, while whole-genome sequencing (WGS) is widely used in AMR surveillance laboratories to predict phenotypic resistance in major food-borne pathogens. AMR risk assessment usually considers factors such as the pathogenicity of the ARG-carrying bacterial host, the abundance of ARGs and their mobility potential inferred from association with plasmids or other mobile genetic elements that facilitate horizontal gene transfer. Clinical relevance of antimicrobials and the severity of clinical outcomes can further be implemented in AMR risk assessment. Exposure assessment contextualises hazards within real-world scenarios by estimating consumer exposure to AMR bacteria or their ARGs through food or other routes. Despite challenges in fully quantitative assessments, the integration of NGS-based surveillance with risk modelling represents a critical step towards proactive AMR risk management. In this study, broiler samples from different stages of a Slovenian and a Spanish slaughterhouse were analysed using conventional microbiology, shotgun metagenomic sequencing and WGS of isolates of selected pathogenic species. A modular, semi-quantitative risk assessment model was developed that combines (meta)genomic data with key risk factors and, where available, exposure assessment. This approach prioritises AMR risks in broiler meat processing and supports evidence-based decision-making in the areas of food safety and public health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.