Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41404294›Full record

ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025

The Protocol for: Do peers enhance alcohol use outcomes in group motivational interviewing? A translational clinical trial investigating brain synchrony in underage emerging adults during a fMRI hyperscanning task and its association with 12 month alcohol use reductions.

Sarah W Feldstein Ewing, Genevieve F Dash, Karen A Hudson, Benedict Hyun, Manshu Yang, Linnea Stahl, Kristine Rømer Thomsen, Ana Paula Gonçalves Donate, Francesca M Filbey

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Sarah W Feldstein EwingORCID 0000-0002-9120-9306
Benedict Hyun
Linnea Stahl
Kristine Rømer ThomsenORCID 0000-0003-3612-5529
Ana Paula Gonçalves DonateORCID 0000-0003-3048-3042
Francesca M FilbeyORCID 0000-0002-7466-4796

Funding

Do peers enhance or detract progress in group motivational interviewing? A look into emerging adult brain and behaviorR01AA030678 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND · PI Sarah W. Feldstein Ewing, Francesca Filbey · 2023 to 2026
$1.8M
NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA030678
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aims: Alcohol is the top substance used by US emerging adults under legal drinking age (underage emerging adults; U-EA; ages 18-19). U-EA are unlikely to seek or receive indicated alcohol interventions. It is imperative to find brief, effective interventions to reduce U-EA drinking. Developmental neuroscience reflects that peers hold higher neural salience during adolescence, as evidenced by differential neural response with real and/or simulated peers, even when those peers were not friends, and particularly in the context of alcohol. Peers also activate positive (prosocial) neural and behavioral responses among adolescents. The role of positive, prosocial peer feedback is consequential given that the most widely-used U-EA platforms for adolescent addiction intervention are group-based interventions. We propose functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) hyperscanning (tandem dyadic scanning) to evaluate U-EA brain response in the underexamined, but widely-utilized, group motivational interviewing (MI). We will examine associations between youth brain synchrony generated in an fMRI hyperscanning task and alcohol use reductions at 12 month follow-up. We hypothesize that greater neural alignment in the social cognition network during positive, prosocial peer interactions (peer-directed change talk) will be associated with greater post-intervention behavior change (lower number of past month drinking days) at 12 months. Design: Within-subjects. Setting: UConn Health and UT-Dallas. Participants: This study will enroll n=248 U-EA (ages 18-19) with ≥1 past month binge drinking event (4/3 standard drinks per occasion for males/females) via community and campus recruitment. Intervention and comparator: Group MI (no comparator; within-subjects). Measurements: This protocol will utilize synchronized fMRI (hyperscanning) to examine positive, prosocial peer-directed health promotive language (peer-directed change talk) directly generated during and extracted from the group MI session. Primary outcomes include fMRI-based hyperscanning metrics (BOLD synchrony in social cognition networks) and behavioral measures (past month alcohol use days measured viaTimeline Followback; TLFB) at 12 months. Secondary outcomes will evaluate the same relationship at 3- and 6-months. Comment: This translational study is crucial for making meaningful gains in adolescent addiction intervention. We could find no peer-reviewed studies examining fMRI hyperscanning in an adolescent addiction intervention context. And, fMRI hyperscanning is at the forefront of interactive, dyadic youth research in socially-relevant and ecologically valid settings. In addition, due to the limited empirical evaluations of group interventions, including group MI, the use of fMRI hyperscanning is timely and offers a unique examination with high clinical impact for young people struggling with addiction.

Identifiers

PMID41404294
PMCPMC12704630

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.