Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41404270›Full record

ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025

Evaluating Linkage Approaches for Address-Level Socioenvironmental Exposure Assessment.

Carson S Hartlage, Erika Rasnick Manning, Cole Brokamp

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Carson S HartlageORCID 0000-0001-7875-8215
Erika Rasnick ManningORCID 0000-0002-7150-5845

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate linkage of addresses to parcel-level data is essential for hyperlocal environmental exposure assessment, yet the performance of methods, including their impact on exposure misclassification and bias, remains poorly characterized. Using a gold standard match of 853,255 National Address Database records to authoritative datasets from Hamilton and Franklin Counties, Ohio, we evaluated address tag fuzzy matching and geocoding-based (geomatching) approaches on accuracy of linked parcel identifier and parcel market total value and usage type. Address tag fuzzy matching achieved 100% agreement; address point geomatching performed moderately well (65.1% - 76.1%), and street range geomatching performed poorly (7.2% - 59.2%). Poorer agreement was more common in neighborhoods with higher address densities and more community material deprivation, highlighting potential for differential misclassification of exposure assessment. These findings emphasize a need for precise, scalable, and standardized linkage approaches to support valid address- and parcel-level exposure assessment in clinical and population health research.

Identifiers

PMID41404270
PMCPMC12704638

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.