Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41404240›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Maternal Dengue Infection and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes.

Elaveyini U, Tharanikumar Sivakumar, Chandrasekaran Krithika, Chitathoor Sridhar, Aroshime Hercules

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Elaveyini UObstetrics and Gynaecology, Saveetha Medical College and Hospital, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Chennai, IND.
Tharanikumar SivakumarOral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Meenakshi Academy of Higher Education and Research, Chennai, IND.
Chandrasekaran KrithikaOral Medicine and Radiology, Meenakshi Ammal Dental College, Meenakshi Academy of Higher Education and Research, Chennai, IND.
Chitathoor SridharInternal Medicine, Meenakshi Academy of Higher Education and Research, Chennai, IND.
Aroshime HerculesObstetrics and Gynaecology, New Hope Hospital, Chennai, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dengue virus (DENV) infection is endemic in many regions with high fertility rates and poses a significant public health concern during pregnancy. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the association between maternal dengue infection and adverse pregnancy outcomes. A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science was conducted up to July 11, 2025. Eligible studies were comparative observational in design, with laboratory-confirmed dengue infection in pregnant women and at least one fetal or neonatal outcome reported. Outcomes of interest included stillbirth rate (SBR), miscarriage rate (MBR), preterm birth rate (PBR), low birth weight (LBW), small for gestational age (SGA), neonatal death (ND), and postpartum hemorrhage (PPH). Random-effects models were employed to calculate pooled odds ratios (OR), and the risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. A total of 35 studies encompassing approximately 65,000 pregnancies from 14 countries were included. Dengue infection during pregnancy was significantly associated with increased odds of stillbirth (OR 2.70; 95% CI: 1.44-5.10), miscarriage (OR 3.51; 95% CI: 1.15-10.77), and ND (OR 3.03; 95% CI: 1.17-7.83). Associations with preterm birth, LBW, and SGA were inconsistent but appeared stronger in cases of severe or first-trimester infections. These findings underscore the need for targeted clinical and public health interventions in dengue-endemic regions to mitigate maternal and perinatal risks. This review is registered with PROSPERO (CRD420251102253).

Indexed as

dengue virus (denv)miscarriageneonatal mortalitypregnancy-related outcomesstillbirthsystematic review and meta-analysis

Identifiers

PMID41404240
PMCPMC12703549

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.