ReviewCureus2025
The Role of Artificial Intelligence in General Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Machine Learning Applications in Colorectal Cancer Treatment Outcomes.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Precision Medicine and Artificial Intelligence in Next-Generation Cancer Surgery: A Comprehensive Analysis of Clinical Applications, Therapeutic Outcomes, and Implementation Strategies.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2025Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence in onco-anaesthesia: Current applications, challenges, and future directions.World journal of methodology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a leading cause of global cancer morbidity and mortality, with surgical resection as the primary curative treatment. The integration of artificial intelligence (AI), particularly machine learning (ML), into CRC surgery presents a promising avenue for improving patient care through enhanced prediction and precision. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to synthesize evidence on the impact of ML on CRC surgical outcomes. A comprehensive search of PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science was conducted on September 1, 2025, following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Ultimately, 10 studies were included in the qualitative synthesis, with a subset used in the meta-analysis. The results indicated that ML-assisted or robotic surgeries were associated with a nonsignificant reduction in postoperative complications (risk ratio (RR) 0.85, 95% CI 0.70-1.03) compared to conventional methods. However, robotic procedures were significantly linked to longer operative times (mean difference (MD) +45.2 min, 95% CI 28.5-61.9). The meta-analysis of predictive model performance yielded a pooled area under the curve (AUC) of 0.84 (95% CI: 0.80-0.88), suggesting good overall discriminatory ability, though this finding is tempered by substantial heterogeneity (I²=68%) and a high risk of bias across all included studies. In conclusion, while ML applications in CRC surgery show potential, current evidence does not confirm significant superiority in reducing complications. The increased operative time and methodological limitations of existing research highlight the need for more rigorous, high-quality trials to fully ascertain the clinical value of these technologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.