ArticleFrontiers in plant science2025
Mapping stability and instability hotspots in Jiangsu's vegetation: an explainable machine learning approach to climatic and anthropogenic drivers.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Understanding vegetation stability is essential for evaluating ecosystem resilience and informing adaptive land management under changing climatic conditions. This study investigated the spatiotemporal patterns and climatic drivers of vegetation stability across Jiangsu Province, China. Vegetation productivity was assessed using the annual maximum kernel normalized difference vegetation index, while stability was quantified through two indicators: proportional variability (PV) and lag-one autocorrelation (AR). Results revealed that 15.77% of the province experienced increases in PV and AR, indicating growing vegetation instability, particularly in the south-central and southeastern regions. In contrast, 84.23% of the area showed declining PV and AR trends, suggesting enhanced stability, mainly in the southwestern, northern, and central regions. Spatially, high AR values were observed in western and southern Jiangsu, while high PV values were concentrated along the eastern coast and near Lake Taihu. More stable areas-characterized by low PV and AR-were primarily located in the central and northwestern regions. An interpretable machine learning model identified background solar radiation and its temporal variability as the dominant drivers of vegetation stability, followed by vapor pressure deficit (VPD). Precipitation variability had minimal influence. SHAP dependence plots revealed nonlinear responses: moderate radiation and higher soil moisture promoted stability, while elevated VPD and radiation variability reduced it. Most regions were in favorable ecological condition, although ~20% were classified as poor and another ~20% remained uncertain. These findings highlight the key roles of radiation and moisture in regulating vegetation stability and offer insights for climate-resilient land management in intensively cultivated landscapes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.