ReviewFrontiers in drug safety and regulation2025
The use of observed-to-expected analyses as a signal detection tool in COVID-19 vaccine safety surveillance: lessons learned from an industry perspective.
Review in Frontiers in drug safety and regulation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Beyond correlation and causation: epistemic caution, anomalous findings, and COVID-19 vaccine safety.Philosophy, ethics, and humanities in medicine : PEHM · 2026Review
- Background incidence rates from electronic healthcare databases for vaccine safety monitoring: review of challenges from the COVID-19 vaccination campaign and proposal for best practices.Frontiers in drug safety and regulation · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
During the pandemic, the accelerated review and authorization of coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) vaccines by regulatory authorities elicited the need for rapid and thorough worldwide signal detection and evaluation. To meet this need, the European Medicines Agency and other health authorities expected that, in addition to routine signal detection, COVID-19 vaccine manufacturers should leverage observed-to-expected (O/E) analyses unconventionally as a quantitative method for signal detection of adverse events of special interest (AESIs). The objective of O/E analyses in vaccine signal detection was to determine if AESIs were occurring at a higher-than-expected rate in the vaccinated population in comparison with an unexposed population. The use of O/E was intended to mitigate the challenge of analyzing large volumes of individual case safety reports (ICSRs) received over a very short period following mass vaccination campaigns. The "Beyond COVID-19 Monitoring Excellence" (BeCOME) initiative, a non-competitive voluntary initiative launched in 2022 by COVID-19 vaccine Marketing Authorization Holders (MAHs) and key stakeholders, was established to align systems, enhance processes, and foster innovation in post-marketing vaccine monitoring, building on lessons from the pandemic. A dedicated working group was created to review and share MAHs' experience on O/E analyses used as an additional tool for signal detection during the COVID-19 pandemic. This review presents the industry perspective on using O/E analyses for COVID-19 vaccine signal detection, including challenges and limitations encountered, and proposes best practices for future improvement. Despite the priority and resources devoted to O/E analyses, no
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.