Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41404097›Full record

ArticleNMC case report journal2025

Vascular Eagle Syndrome in Elderly Patients Diagnosed by Dynamic Magnetic Resonance Angiography: A Case Report and Literature Review.

Hideki Nakajima, Yu Sato, Koichi Hakozaki, Tetsushi Yago, Kazuhiko Tsuda, Hidenori Suzuki

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in NMC case report journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hideki NakajimaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Matsusaka Chuo General Hospital, Matsusaka, Mie, Japan.
Yu SatoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Matsusaka Chuo General Hospital, Matsusaka, Mie, Japan.
Koichi HakozakiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, Tsu, Mie, Japan.
Tetsushi YagoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Matsusaka Chuo General Hospital, Matsusaka, Mie, Japan.
Kazuhiko TsudaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Matsusaka Chuo General Hospital, Matsusaka, Mie, Japan.
Hidenori SuzukiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, Tsu, Mie, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dynamic assessment by computed tomography angiography or digital subtraction angiography is important for the diagnosis of vascular eagle syndrome, although these require the use of contrast media. Magnetic resonance angiography with neck flexion and extension, named dynamic magnetic resonance angiography, can dynamically evaluate the relationship between the internal carotid artery and the styloid process with no use of contrast media. A 74-year-old male with chronic kidney disease was rushed to our hospital due to recurrent infarction in the left cerebral hemisphere. Magnetic resonance angiography in the neutral neck position showed no abnormality in the left internal carotid artery, but computed tomography revealed bilateral elongated styloid process. Dynamic magnetic resonance angiography was performed to show that the left internal carotid artery was compressed by the styloid process during neck flexion but not during neck extension. Carotid ultrasound revealed a thrombus in the high cervical portion of the left internal carotid artery. Styloidectomy was performed, and cerebral infarction has not recurred since then. Dynamic magnetic resonance angiography may be a useful diagnostic modality without using contrast media for vascular eagle syndrome.

Indexed as

Eagle syndromeelderlymagnetic resonance angiographystyloid processvascular eagle syndrome

Identifiers

PMID41404097
PMCPMC12705261

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.