ArticleAnnals of Ibadan postgraduate medicine2025
CLINICOEPIDEMIOLOGICAL FINDINGS AMONG CHILDREN AND ADOLESCENT PRESENTING WITH SUSPECTED ANKYLOGLOSSIA IN OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY PRACTICE AT A TERTIARY INSTITUTION.
Article in Annals of Ibadan postgraduate medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Ankyloglossia is a congenital oral anomaly with varying timing and modality of presentation. This study aimed to determine the epidemiology, clinical presentations, and management of children and adolescents with ankyloglossia at an otorhinolaryngological practice at a tertiary institution in Nigeria. Methods: This was a cross-sectional, hospital-based study of all children and adolescent patients who presented with tongue-tie in the Ear, Nose and Throat Department of Ekiti State University Teaching Hospital, Ado Ekiti, Nigeria. The study was carried out over a period of 10 years. Structured interviewer-administered questionnaires were administered to consenting patients to obtain data. Data obtained were collated and analysed using SPSS version 23. Data were expressed using frequency tables, percentages, bar and pie charts. Results: A total of 18,431 patients were seen over the study period (2014 to 2023) out of which 94 (0.51%) presented with complaints of tongue-tie and 43 (0.23%) were diagnosed with ankyloglossia. Among the patients who presented with tongue tie, the peak age group was 1-5 years. There was male preponderance with a maleto- female ratio of 2.8:1.0. Urban dwellers accounted for 59.6%. There was no family history of ankyloglossia in the majority of the cases. Parents brought the patients in 45(47.9%) of the cases. The commonest presenting complaint was challenge with verbal communication among the patients as seen in 51(54.3%) of the patients presenting with tongue tie. No prior intervention was instituted in 8.5% while family physicians treated 43.6%. Normal tongue was recorded in 51(54.3%) cases. Ankyloglossia was diagnosed in 43(45.7%) cases, and other diagnoses included delayed developmental milestones in 23.4% and articulation disorder in 19.1%. In those with confirmed ankyloglossia, the commonest degree of ankyloglossia was mild (class 1) ankyloglossia. The commonest surgical treatment offered to patients diagnosed with tongue- tie was frenulotomy in 33(76.7%) cases. Conclusion: Understanding the anatomical definition of ankyloglossia is significant in the diagnosis and management of patients because many patients were wrongly diagnosed and treated for ankyloglossia. Hearing assessment should be done on children with suspected ankyloglossia because of possible articulation problems. Some of the patients that could not communicate properly were found to have hearing problems and not ankyloglossia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41404095PMC12704337What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.