ArticleAnnals of Ibadan postgraduate medicine2025
DIAGNOSTIC EFFICACY OF ASPIRATION CYTOLOGY VERSUS CELL BLOCK IN PALPABLE BREAST LESIONS.
Article in Annals of Ibadan postgraduate medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Breast masses often cause anxiety in women due to concerns about cancer. Fine Needle Aspiration (FNA) is a common technique used to diagnose breast lumps before surgery. Cell blocks, created from the aspirates, are important for preserving cell structure and characteristics, as well as for further testing with immunohistochemistry. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of FNA and cell blocks in diagnosing breast lesions. Methods: This one-year prospective study included 90 patients with palpable breast lesions who presented at Irrua Specialist Teaching Hospital from December 1, 2020, to November 30, 2021. FNA and cell block procedures were performed on each patient, with samples stained using haematoxylin and eosin (H&E). The breast lesions were classified as malignant or benign based on fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) and cell block results, which were then compared with the histological diagnosis of tissue biopsies. Results: The study found that FNAC had a diagnostic accuracy of 82.5% for breast lesions, with a sensitivity of 76.0% and specificity of 98.5%. The positive predictive value (PPV) was 88.9% and the negative predictive value (NPV) was 82.7%. Cell blocks showed a higher diagnostic accuracy (94.0%), with a sensitivity of 95.0% and specificity of 98.5%. The PPV and NPV for cell block diagnosis were 94.1% and 91.8%, respectively. Conclusion: The cell block method is a more accurate diagnostic tool for breast tumours than FNAC. It allows for the study of tissue architecture and may eliminate the need for invasive biopsies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41404089PMC12704344What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.