ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025
Application of radiomics model based on FDG-PET/CT for the assessment of therapeutic effect in patients with newly-diagnosed multiple myeloma.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- B-Mode Ultrasound Radiomics for Differentiating Benign and Malignant Small Hyperechoic Renal Masses: An Exploratory Single-Center Experience.Journal of imaging · 2026Article
- Comparative Molecular Insights and Computational Modeling of Multiple Myeloma and Osteosarcoma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate the prediction value of radiomics models based on FDG-PET/CT for the therapeutic effect in patients with newly-diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM). Materials and methods: We retrospectively reviewed the clinical characteristics and Results: Gender was the only one of clinical characteristics found to be independent prognosis factor for treatment evaluation, with a p-value of 0.041. The radiomics models outperformed the Clinical model significantly, among which the PET-CT model yielded the best results with the AUC of 0.809. The PET + CT + Clinical model achieved the optimal performance after integrating clinical and radiomic features, with the AUC of 0.813. Conclusions: The FDG-PET/CT-based radiomics model, particularly when integrated with clinical features, can more effectively predict deep treatment response in newly diagnosed MM patients, offering significant clinical utility for early treatment stratification and personalized therapeutic guidance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.