ArticleInternational journal of general medicine2025
Development and Validation of a Risk Prediction Model for New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation in Sepsis.
Article in International journal of general medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The cumulative incidence of atrial fibrillation in the hospitalized medical patient: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European heart journal open · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Sepsis patients face a high risk of new-onset atrial fibrillation (NOAF), which increases mortality. Thus, it is significant to construct a risk prediction model for early risk stratification. Objective: To construct and validate a risk prediction model for NOAF in sepsis. Methods: A total of 423 sepsis patients were randomly divided into training (n=299) and validation (n=124) cohorts. Predictors were selected using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression, and independent risk factors were identified by multivariate logistic regression to construct a nomogram. Model performance was assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), Hosmer-Lemeshow test, and calibration curves. Clinical utility was evaluated using decision curve analysis (DCA) and clinical impact curves (CIC). Results: Log interleukin-6 (Log IL-6), blood urea nitrogen (BUN), and heart rate (HR) were identified as independent risk factors for NOAF. The nomogram demonstrated strong discriminative ability, with AUCs of 0.925 in the training cohort and 0.866 in the validation cohort. Calibration was good in both cohorts, and DCA and CIC indicated favorable clinical utility across a range of threshold probabilities. Conclusion: A risk prediction model incorporating Log IL-6, BUN, and HR effectively could predict NOAF in sepsis patients, with good discrimination, calibration, and potential clinical applicability for early risk identification. However, prior to further clinical application, additional multicenter, prospective studies are required for external validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.