Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41403962›Full record

ArticleData in brief2025

Bangla-ToCo: A context-aware dataset for Bengali toxic comment detection.

Sayma Akter Rupa, Md Musfique Anwar, Nadia Afrin Ritu, Khandoker Nosiba Arifin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Data in brief, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sayma Akter RupaR.P. Shaha University, Bangladesh.
Md Musfique AnwarJahangirnagar University, Bangladesh.
Nadia Afrin RituJahangirnagar University, Bangladesh.
Khandoker Nosiba ArifinDaffodil International University, Bangladesh.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In today's online world, abusive and toxic comments on social media have become a growing concern, particularly for languages like Bengali, where there are currently few reliable automatic moderation systems. In this study, we introduce a context-aware dataset for identifying toxic comments in Bengali by considering how a comment's meaning changes when we read it alongside the relevant information. We present a dataset of 1004 Bengali news comments obtained from the official Facebook pages of two widely read Bangladeshi news portals such as ProthomAlo and News24. Each data record includes six attributes: the news title, metadata of the article, the target comment, its predecessor comment, its successor comment, and the commenter's username. Unlike existing Bengali corpora that present isolated text, this dataset preserves conversational context, enabling more accurate interpretation of ambiguous or short comments. The dataset has been annotated into two categories: Toxic and Non-Toxic. Annotation was performed independently by three human annotators, and the final label for each comment was assigned through majority voting to ensure consistency and reduce individual bias. This balanced class distribution makes the dataset particularly suitable for supervised learning and benchmarking. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first context-aware Bengali toxic comment dataset. Although modest in size, it provides one of the first systematically annotated resources for Bengali, a low-resource language in NLP. It has potential applications in abusive content detection, sentiment and stance classification, conversational modelling, and social discourse analysis, making it a valuable contribution for both computational linguistics and social sciences.

Indexed as

Low-resource languageNatural Language ProcessingSocial mediaToxicity classification

Identifiers

PMID41403962
PMCPMC12703972

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.