ArticleMayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes2026
The Impact of a Remote Patient Care Program on Health Care Costs and Utilization Among Medicare Patients With Chronic Disease.
Article in Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Remote patient monitoring coupled with technology-enabled, guideline-directed clinical care-or remote patient care (RPC)-has consistently led to improved outcomes for Medicare patients with chronic diseases. However, the ability for RPC to drive reductions in total cost of care and health care utilization is limited. We sought to determine whether an RPC program can reduce health care costs and utilization. Using patient-level Medicare claims data, a difference in difference analysis was conducted to assess the impact of an RPC program compared with a propensity score-matched control group on total health care costs and resource utilization over a 12-month period following program activation. The retrospective analysis included patients enrolled into an RPC program from July 1, 2022 to October 31, 2023 from primary care and cardiology clinics across 15 states. The RPC program included a group of clinicians who monitored and triaged vitals and conducted clinical visits using standardized clinical protocols to facilitate guideline-directed clinical interventions. We compared 5872 patients enrolled in an RPC program to 11,449 eligible propensity score-matched control patients. RPC resulted in a statistically significant reduction in total cost of care (-$1302 per patient per year;
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.