Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41403873›Full record

ArticleJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2025

Development and Validation of Clinical Practice Standards for Physical Restraint in Hospitalized Patients: A Multi-Method Study.

Ronghong Luo, Meiling Yu, Chun Zhou, Ya Wang, Cong Liu, Xuemei Zhang, Ting Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ronghong LuoDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Third Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 401120, People's Republic of China.
Meiling YuDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Third Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 401120, People's Republic of China.
Chun ZhouDepartment of Urology, Third Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 401120, People's Republic of China.
Ya WangDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Third Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 401120, People's Republic of China.
Cong LiuCenter for Neurological Diseases, Third Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 401120, People's Republic of China.
Xuemei ZhangCenter for Neurological Diseases, Third Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 401120, People's Republic of China.
Ting ChenDepartment of Oncology, Third Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 401120, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Physical restraint is commonly used in clinical settings to ensure patient safety, yet its application lacks standardization and may lead to adverse physical and psychological effects. There remains a significant gap in evidence-based guidelines tailored to nurses practices. Objective: This study aimed to develop and validate clinical practice standards for physical restraint in hospitalized patients from a nurses staff perspective and to evaluate their impact on nurses knowledge, attitude, behaviors, and patient outcomes. Methods: A multi-stage design was employed, including a cross-sectional survey, semi-structured interviews, a Delphi expert consultation, and a controlled trial. The study involved 202 nurses and 100 patients from a tertiary hospital in Chongqing, China. The intervention group received standardized training based on the newly developed restraint criteria, while the control group followed routine protocols. Results: The expert consultation achieved high consensus (Cr = 0.85). Post-training, the intervention group showed significant improvements in knowledge, attitude, and practice scores (P < 0.05), and a reduction in restraint use and duration (P < 0.05). Although adverse event rates decreased in the intervention group, the differences were not statistically significant. Conclusion: The developed standards effectively enhance nurses practice, reduce unnecessary restraint use, and maintain patient safety, supporting their integration into clinical nurses management.

Indexed as

know-trust-behaviour scorenurses staffobservational study standardphysical restraint

Identifiers

PMID41403873
PMCPMC12703033

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.