ReviewOchsner journal2025
Pharmacologic Management of Central Fever in Patients With Acute Brain Injury.
Review in Ochsner journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Central fever is a noninfectious increase in body temperature to >37.5 °C that commonly occurs in patients with acute brain injury. Because central fever has detrimental effects on the injured brain and is associated with prolonged neurointensive care unit stays, timely diagnosis and treatment are imperative. Management includes both pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic methods. However, the optimal pharmacologic approach for the management of central fever remains unclear, so we conducted a scoping review to evaluate the pharmaceutical therapies currently being used. Methods: We screened 183 articles from database searches of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane. Information on study type, interventions, outcomes, and side effects were extracted and analyzed from 13 articles that met inclusion criteria. Results: Our literature search showed that acetaminophen, baclofen, baclofen with propranolol, bromocriptine, dantrolene, and diclofenac have been administered to patients with central fever. While most of the articles included in this review are case reports, a randomized clinical trial identified continuous diclofenac infusion as a promising intervention. Acetaminophen reduced fever in patients with central fever; however, when compared to placebo, no significant difference in core temperature reduction was observed. In the articles that included a discussion of side effects, hepatotoxicity was the most commonly mentioned adverse effect. Conclusion: Diclofenac emerged as the most evidence-supported therapy, backed by higher-quality studies and consistent central fever resolution with relatively few side effects. Because of the paucity of high-quality evidence, further research is needed to establish optimal treatment strategies with minimal adverse effects for patients experiencing central fever.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.