Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41403860›Full record

ReviewOchsner journal2025

Pharmacologic Management of Central Fever in Patients With Acute Brain Injury.

Maria Turcanu, Ethan Levitch, Bobby D Nossaman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Ochsner journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Maria TurcanuThe University of Queensland Medical School, Ochsner Clinical School, New Orleans, LA.
Ethan LevitchThe University of Queensland Medical School, Ochsner Clinical School, New Orleans, LA.
Bobby D NossamanThe University of Queensland Medical School, Ochsner Clinical School, New Orleans, LA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Central fever is a noninfectious increase in body temperature to >37.5 °C that commonly occurs in patients with acute brain injury. Because central fever has detrimental effects on the injured brain and is associated with prolonged neurointensive care unit stays, timely diagnosis and treatment are imperative. Management includes both pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic methods. However, the optimal pharmacologic approach for the management of central fever remains unclear, so we conducted a scoping review to evaluate the pharmaceutical therapies currently being used. Methods: We screened 183 articles from database searches of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane. Information on study type, interventions, outcomes, and side effects were extracted and analyzed from 13 articles that met inclusion criteria. Results: Our literature search showed that acetaminophen, baclofen, baclofen with propranolol, bromocriptine, dantrolene, and diclofenac have been administered to patients with central fever. While most of the articles included in this review are case reports, a randomized clinical trial identified continuous diclofenac infusion as a promising intervention. Acetaminophen reduced fever in patients with central fever; however, when compared to placebo, no significant difference in core temperature reduction was observed. In the articles that included a discussion of side effects, hepatotoxicity was the most commonly mentioned adverse effect. Conclusion: Diclofenac emerged as the most evidence-supported therapy, backed by higher-quality studies and consistent central fever resolution with relatively few side effects. Because of the paucity of high-quality evidence, further research is needed to establish optimal treatment strategies with minimal adverse effects for patients experiencing central fever.

Indexed as

Acetaminophenantipyreticsbaclofenbrain injuriesbromocriptinedantrolenediclofenacdrug therapyfeverpropranololtemperature

Identifiers

PMID41403860
PMCPMC12704469

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.