Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41403843›Full record

ArticleCogent mental health2024

Jealousy: A comparison of monogamous and consensually non-monogamous women's experience.

Joli Hamilton, Nicholas R Morrison, Ayla N Gioia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cogent mental health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Joli HamiltonDepartment of Psychology, Westfield State University, Westfield, MA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-7998-1615
Nicholas R MorrisonDepartment of Psychology, Westfield State University, Westfield, MA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7268-1170
Ayla N GioiaDepartment of Psychology, Hofstra University, Hempstead, NY, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Jealousy, the emotional experience of feeling threatened when a valued relationship is interrupted by an outside party, is often described as a subjectively negative experience. Research suggests that jealousy is a source of conflict in monogamous relationships, yet little empirical research has examined the experience of jealousy in consensually non-monogamous (CNM) relationships. Given the differences that exist between monogamous and CNM relationships (e.g. differences in prioritization of autonomy and agency) and the scant empirical literature regarding consensual non-monogamy, it is important to further examine the role of jealousy in different relationship structures. The current study aims to explore the lived experiences of jealousy in cis-women across these relationship structures. The authors selected interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA), a qualitative approach known for its robustness in supporting in-depth investigations of idiographic psychological phenomena, to explore experiences of jealousy in both monogamous (

Indexed as

consensual non-monogamyinterpretative phenomenological analysisjealousymonogamy

Identifiers

PMID41403843
PMCPMC12704110

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.