ArticleiScience2025
Dinosaur skull geometry does not follow functional optimization trends but facilitates adaptability.
Article in iScience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Modelling compressive loading in large-bodied mammals reveals distinct biomechanical strategies in proboscidean humeri.Journal of anatomy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dinosaurs exhibited a remarkable array of skull shapes and sizes. However, the geometry of the cranial skeleton and its different functional units (rostrum, orbital region, and braincase) has not been quantified biomechanically. Furthermore, it is unclear if skull evolution followed a trend toward optimization of feeding performance and structural integrity. Here, we used morphometric analyses, theoretical morphospaces, and biomechanical modeling to quantify skull geometry and investigate how skull proportions shaped dinosaur evolution. Our results demonstrate that skull proportions followed a narrowly constrained pattern, with the rostrum showing the largest variability and plasticity. Dinosaur skulls did not evolve toward functional optimality but evolved within a "Goldilocks" zone that represented a compromise of different functions. Broad adaptability of the rostrum may have been beneficial during the transition from non-avian dinosaurs to birds, with the rostrum serving as a focal point for environmental manipulation due to the loss of forelimb function for flight.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.