ReviewMaedica2025
Acute Appendicitis Over the Time. The Impact of Scientific Discoveries and Technological Advances on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute Appendicitis.
Review in Maedica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Are We Truly Excluding Appendicoliths and Free Fluid Without Imaging? A Methodological Query on the Management of Acute Appendicitis in South Africa.World journal of surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acute appendicitis is the touchstone of any surgeon. The most common surgical pathology, acute appendicitis, has known over time, depending on the level of scientific knowledge, different therapeutic approaches, from absolute surgical abstinence to absolute surgical indication. No other aspect of surgical pathology has created so many occasions of successes and undeserved failures. Technologization of surgery through the introduction of laparoscopy brought - in addition to indisputable advantages (but whose importance decreases, also indisputably, with patients' age) and additional factors of operative risk - a risk that increases with age and extent of the intervention. At the current time there are clinical studies that optionally support first-line antibiotic treatment for uncomplicated acute appendicitis, surgical treatment being reserved for complicated acute appendicitis. This differentiated therapeutic attitude is possible due to the progresses achieved in abdominal imaging exploration used in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis, including ultrasound, computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), which have allowed a correct morphopathological diagnosis of acute appendicitis. The clinical examination and continuous monitoring of the evolution are essential for the diagnosis and assessment of the effectiveness of the indicated treatment. Unfortunately, Dieulafoy's assertion from the Listerian period that "one should no longer die of acute appendicitis" is still relevant today, in the era of antibiotic therapy and technologization of surgery, as well as - especially - the completion made by Lejars, "with exceptions" ("sauf exceptions").
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.