ArticleMaedica2025
Composite Adhesion Performance in Focus: a Shear Bond Strength Analysis.
Article in Maedica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The goal of this study was to test and compare how well three modern composite materials - Charisma Classic (Kulzer), G-ænial Anterior (GC Corporation) and Omnichroma (Tokuyama) - adhere to enamel surfaces that were prepared in the same way for all three of them. Materials and method: Fifteen human teeth were extracted out, cleaned and kept in isotonic saline for the study. Before the adhesive system was applied, the enamel surfaces were etched with 37% phosphoric acid, cleaned and dried. Each composite was poured into standardised cylindrical moulds (3 mm diameter, 3 mm height) and light-cured for 40 seconds. The specimens were placed in epoxy resin and evaluated using an Instron 8872 universal testing equipment to determine shear bond strength. Five tests were conducted on each material and the mean results were identified by leaving out the outliers. Results: G-ænial Anterior had the highest average SBS value (about 341 N), followed by Omnichroma (about 269 N) and Charisma Classic (about 266 N). Notably, two G-ænial samples showed cohesive fractures within the composite, which means that the bonds between the different parts are very strong. Most of the time, the Charisma and Omnichroma samples failed to adhere at the tooth-composite interface. Conclusions: G-ænial Anterior had the best adhesion to enamel among all examined materials. This was shown by both the bond strength and the way the bond failed. The results indicate that using it in high-stress clinical situations may make it work more effectively and last longer. Even though Charisma Classic and Omnichroma demonstrated steady and moderate adherence, improved adhesive procedures might help them achieve the best possible clinical results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.