ReviewAdvanced pharmaceutical bulletin2025
Platelet-Rich Plasma in Interstitial Cystitis/Bladder Pain Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Review in Advanced pharmaceutical bulletin, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Platelet-rich plasma in selected urological conditions: a narrative review of biological rationale, current evidence, and limitations.Translational andrology and urology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This systematic review aims to critically evaluate the safety and efficacy of PRP therapy in managing interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome (IC/BPS). Methods: Two researchers independently searched related Databases and collected all studies from inception to December 5, 2023. Outcome indicators of symptom relief were pain scores self-assessment using the VAS system, IC symptoms using the O'Leary-Sant score (OSS), urinary frequency, nocturia, post-void residual (PVR), voided volume, and functional bladder capacity. Results: Among 372 retrieved articles, 13 studies, including 426 patients, were included. The pain of patients decreased significantly after treatment with platelet-rich plasma (PRP) compared to the baseline values (MD: -1.93, 95% CI: -2.28, -1.58). All subgroup analyses revealed a decrease in VAS scores after PRP injection. IC symptoms using OSS, and ICSI decreased significantly after treatment. Conclusion: PRP therapy as a new and successful course of treatment may be a novel therapeutic approach in IC/BPS cases. More study with the control arm is required to enhance treatment regimens for this difficult condition and to better understand the mechanisms of action of PRP in IC/BPS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.