ArticleISME communications2025
PanBGC: a pangenome-inspired framework for comparative analysis of biosynthetic gene clusters.
Article in ISME communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- A guide to Direct Pathway Cloning (DiPaC) for natural product discovery.Essays in biochemistry · 2026Review
- Intra- and inter-biosynthetic gene cluster allelic variation as drivers of chemical diversification in Streptomyces.Essays in biochemistry · 2026Review
- Heterologous expression of NRPS and PKS pathways in Escherichia coli: from bottlenecks to biosynthetic platforms.Essays in biochemistry · 2026Review
- PhyloNaP: a user-friendly database of phylogeny for natural product-producing enzymes.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- BisCEET: A Visual Browser for Biosynthetic Gene Clusters Aiding in the Identification of Natural Product Variants and Distinct Tailoring Enzymes.Journal of natural products · 2026Article
- ARTS-DB 2.0: an expanded database for target-directed genome mining across bacteria and fungi.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bacterial secondary metabolites are a major source of therapeutics and play key roles in microbial ecology. These compounds are encoded by biosynthetic gene clusters (BGCs), which show extensive genetic diversity across microbial genomes. While recent advances have enabled clustering of BGCs into gene cluster families (GCFs), there is still a lack of frameworks for systematically analysing their internal diversity at a population scale. Here, we introduce "PanBGC", a pangenome-inspired framework that treats each GCF as a population of related BGCs. This enables classification of biosynthetic genes into core, accessory, and unique categories and provides openness metrics to quantify compositional diversity. Applied to over 250 000 BGCs from more than 35 000 genomes, PanBGC maps biosynthetic diversity of more than 80 000 GCFs. Our analysis reveals that gene composition reshuffling, rather than acquisition of new genes, is the dominant driver of diversity within GCFs, with most families exhibiting closed gene repertoires but high compositional variability. Additionally, transporter-related domains were commonly identified among core genes, reflecting the fundamental importance of compound export in BGC function. To facilitate exploration, we present PanBGC-DB (https://panbgc-db.cs.uni-tuebingen.de), an interactive web platform for comparative BGC analysis. PanBGC-DB offers gene- and domain-level visualizations, phylogenetic tools, openness metrics, and custom query integration. Together, PanBGC and PanBGC-DB provide a scalable framework for exploring BGCs at population resolution and for contextualizing newly discovered BGCs within the global landscape of secondary metabolism.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.