ReviewFrontiers in microbiology2025
Integrated PRRSV prevention and control strategy based on the One Health concept: across the boundaries of virology, ecology and public health.
Review in Frontiers in microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- miR-Novel-80 Suppresses Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus Replication by Targeting the ViralAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Virome analysis reveals ORF7 sequences of type 2 porcine respiratory and reproductive syndrome virus (PRRSV) for the first time in a rodent host (One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus (PRRSV) poses a major threat to global swine production, with substantial economic losses and serious animal welfare concerns. Although PRRSV is not considered a zoonotic agent, its control exemplifies the necessity of a One Health approach, incorporating virological, ecological, immunological, and agricultural dimensions. This article contends that the impact of PRRSV extends beyond porcine populations, significantly contributing to the emergence of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) via secondary bacterial infections and the consequent misuse of antibiotics. Moreover, the environmental persistence of the virus and its potential for indirect transmission raise critical ecological questions that remain unresolved. By synthesizing current evidence, this review delineates the complex interrelationships among PRRSV outbreaks, patterns of antimicrobial use, and environmental contamination. This study propose an integrated One Health framework for PRRSV surveillance and control, emphasizing the implementation of genomic tools, systematic environmental monitoring, and enhanced collaboration among public health, veterinary, and environmental sectors. Integrating these disciplines is crucial to alleviating the multidimensional challenges posed by PRRSV, thereby protecting animal welfare, supporting sustainable agriculture, and strengthening global public health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.