ReviewArchives of medical science : AMS2025
Impact of emergency point-of-care ultrasound on time to diagnosis and treatment amongst patients with ectopic pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Review in Archives of medical science : AMS, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Ectopic pregnancy, a significant cause of morbidity in women of reproductive age, requires timely diagnosis and treatment to reduce adverse outcomes. This study examines the impact of point-of-care ultrasound in the emergency department on the time to diagnosis, treatment, and surgical intervention for ectopic pregnancies. Material and methods: Our review encompassed studies involving patients with ectopic pregnancies who underwent point-of-care ultrasound in emergency settings. The comparator was standard radiology department ultra-sound. We included studies of any design, and the key outcomes were time to diagnosis, treatment, and operating room. Data synthesis employed a random-effects inverse-variance model. The GRADE approach was used to assess evidence quality, and the PRISMA checklist guided our methodology. Results: Overall, four studies were included. For time to diagnosis, the pooled standardized mean difference (SMD) was -1.965, indicating a significant reduction. For time to treatment, the pooled SMD was -0.809, showing a modest effect with considerable heterogeneity ( Conclusions: Point-of-care ultrasound in emergency departments significantly reduced the time to diagnose ectopic pregnancies. The effect on time to treatment and operating room varied, with notable benefits observed in more severe cases. Despite these promising findings, the quality of evidence and high heterogeneity necessitate cautious interpretation and call for further research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.