Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41403612›Full record

ArticleArchives of medical science : AMS2025

Balancing work and maternity roles among women doctors: exploring the relationship between career and family life.

Katarzyna Zych-Krekora, Oskar Sylwestrzak, Michał Krekora

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of medical science : AMS, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Katarzyna Zych-KrekoraUniversity of Social Sciences, Lodz, Poland.
Oskar SylwestrzakDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Polish Mother's Memorial Hospital Research Institute, Lodz, Poland.
Michał KrekoraDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Polish Mother's Memorial Hospital Research Institute, Lodz, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The role of mothers has long been the subject of social stereotyping and debate. Psychological and sociological research suggests that women approach this role with a complex ability to multitask, often prioritising family care over career development. Material and methods: For the present study, an anonymous online questionnaire was developed to collect data from 534 female doctors who are mothers ('mother doctors'). The 32-item questionnaire focused on the relationship between their careers and family life, covering demographic information, family configuration, availability of home help, division of household responsibilities and the impact of these factors on their professional life. Results: The study found that the majority of female doctors surveyed (51.7%) stated unequivocally that motherhood had a significant impact on their approach to patients, with 30.7% indicating a moderate impact. The most commonly cited changes at work related to motherhood were a greater understanding of the needs of patients, especially mothers and children (79.1%), as well as increased empathy (59.0%) and changes in communication style (54.7%) with patients. Conclusions: Motherhood represents a profoundly transformative experience in the professional lives of women doctors, the impact of which goes far beyond stereotypical limitations. Accumulating evidence suggests that mother doctors not only become more organised and resilient to stress, but also develop leadership skills that can contribute to the transformation of the healthcare system in Poland. Childcare challenges are one of the most significant barriers to academic success for mother doctors.

Indexed as

careerinequalitymaternitymotherhood

Identifiers

PMID41403612
PMCPMC12703481

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.