ArticleHealth science reports2025
An Investigation Into the Comprehension, Perceptions, Application, and Determinants Affecting the Utilization of Deepseek Artificial Intelligence by Healthcare Professionals: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Health science reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objective: DeepSeek LLM, launched on January 5, 2024, integrates natural language processing, data analytics, and medical picture analysis. The use of it among frontline healthcare personnel in Western China has not been previously examined. This study evaluates Chengdu clinicians' knowledge, attitudes, and usage habits on DeepSeek while identifying significant impacting factors. Methods: A WeChat-based survey was administered to physicians, nurses, medical technicians, and administrative personnel at two tertiary maternity and pediatric hospitals in Chengdu from February 24 to 26, 2025. The gathered data encompassed demographics, educational attainment, job designation, familiarity with DeepSeek, frequency of use, openness to training, and preferred functionalities. Of the 865 distributed questionnaires, 788 valid replies (91.10%) were analyzed using SPSS 25. Group disparities were analyzed using chi-square tests, and forward likelihood-ratio logistic regression determined predictors of awareness, utilization, and willingness to undergo training ( Results: A total of 94.2% of participants indicated awareness of DeepSeek, predominantly via media sources (83.65%) and peer endorsements (49.53%). Usage was indicated by 76.14% of respondents, comprising 98.6% of physicians and 89.61% of individuals with a master's degree or higher. The desire to train attained 87.44%, with predominant preferences for hands-on practice (99.4%), a platform overview (93.1%), and case study talks (90.4%). Univariate analyses revealed substantial disparities in awareness, utilization, and training interest based on education level, job title, and job type ( Conclusion: There were substantial deficiencies in the awareness and utilization of DeepSeek among healthcare professionals in Chengdu. Educational attainment, professional status, and occupation significantly influence outcomes. Customized training and assistance are essential to facilitate wider and more successful implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.