Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41403529›Full record

ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2025

The gift of life: Understanding the experiences of organ donor families.

Parul Gupta, Vijay Kumar Tadia, Vipin Koushal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Parul GuptaDepartment of Hospital Administration, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India.
Vijay Kumar TadiaDepartment of Hospital Administration, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India.
Vipin KoushalDepartment of Hospital Administration, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The family being a fundamental unit of society in India, the decisions regarding organ donation are usually made collectively within the family, involving not only the immediate family but also extended family members. Such a situation is encountered with brain death and organ donation as well. Therefore, delving into the family's journey before, during, and after organ donation is essential for refining best practices and transforming public perceptions. Objectives: 1. To explore the factors influencing the family decision making regarding deceased organ donation. 2. To examine the complexities involved in decision making after a request for organ donation. 3. To gain insights into the experiences of families during organ donation journey. Setting and Design: A descriptive exploratory study using mixed-method approach was conducted at a public hospital in North India. Methods and Material: A semistructured questionnaire containing demographic data with different variables and questions about experience of decision maker during organ donation process was used. Results: Following the communication of brain death, 15% (n = 12) of decision makers were confused about brain death and 25% (n = 20) were very hopeful. 32% (n = 26) had accepted brain death as death. 78% (n = 63) of decision makers expressed a lack of sufficient knowledge about organ donation to make an informed decision. Conclusion: The study underscores the importance of perceptions of decision makers and the significant potential of public sector hospitals in facilitating deceased organ donation (DOD). Trust in these institutions plays a crucial role in achieving successful DOD outcomes.

Indexed as

Deceased organ donationorgan donationperception of decision maker

Identifiers

PMID41403529
PMCPMC12705019

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.