ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2025
A comparative study of methicillin resistance and mupirocin resistance in
Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- In Vitro Activity of Mupirocin Against Methicillin-ResistantMicroorganisms · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Aim: The aim was to determine SA nasal carriage rate and compare the prevalence of methicillin resistance and mupirocin resistance in SA isolated from health care worker and community population. Settings and Design: Cross-sectional study was performed in the Microbiology Department from March 2024 to August 2024. Material and Methods: Nasal swabs from 396 study participants including health care worker and community population, were processed. Methicillin and mupirocin resistance (low level and high level) based on disc diffusion was determined on SA isolates. Statistical Analysis: It was performed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software v24.0. Results: The overall nasal carriage rate for SA was 17.92% (71/396). Among these only nine were methicillin-sensitive SA and 62 harbored a methicillin-resistant Conclusions: SA carriage rate in anterior nares of healthy healthcare workers is higher as compared to community population. This indicates that health care worker should adhere to infection control practices more stringently. None of the SA isolates showed mupirocin resistance. This might point out that mupirocin is not being used for
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.