Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41403498›Full record

ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2025

Patients' contentment and experiences with clinical care and services provided in a selected newly established hospital.

Navjot Kaur, Shiv Kumar Mudgal, C Vasantha Kalyani, Jaya Sinha, Monika Kankarwal, C Vasanth

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Navjot KaurInstitute of Nursing Education and Research, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bathinda, Punjab, India.
Shiv Kumar MudgalCollege of Nursing, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Deoghar, Jharkhand, India.
C Vasantha KalyaniCollege of Nursing, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Deoghar, Jharkhand, India.
Jaya SinhaCollege of Nursing, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Deoghar, Jharkhand, India.
Monika KankarwalCollege of Nursing, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Deoghar, Jharkhand, India.
C VasanthCollege of Nursing, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Deoghar, Jharkhand, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Patient contentment is pertinent for measuring the performance of health- care service delivery, which is a multidimensional construct that depends on many factors. Out-patient department (OPD) is the first point of contact of the hospital with the patient. Patient satisfaction is one of the most essential outcome indicators to be measured to evaluate the quality of services provided to the patient and also provide the opportunity to improve the quality of services. Methodology: An institution-based mixed methods study (convergent-parallel design) was conducted. Study was conducted in the outpatient departments of a tertiary care hospital. Participants was selected using convenience sampling technique. A self-structured questionnaire was used to collect data. Results: Out of 2000 patients, 1077 (54%) were highly satisfied, 845 (42%) were moderately satisfied, whereas 78 (4%) were unsatisfied. The overall satisfaction among 2000 patients was found to be 95.8025±2.21. Mean satisfaction improved over the time as the facilities improved. Conclusion: The overall contentment of patients with the services provided was good. As the institution is newly established, patients' expectations were high and increasing day by day so a few were unsatisfied also.

Indexed as

Medical carepatient contentmentpatient perception

Identifiers

PMID41403498
PMCPMC12705028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.