Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41403496›Full record

ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2025

Exploring healthcare workers' perspectives: A comprehensive mixed-method investigation of knowledge, belief, and perceptions towards COVID-19 vaccination in Madhya Pradesh, India.

Naseema Shafqat, Surya Bali, Veena Verma, Chitrekha Sippy, Jisa T George, Ranjana Verma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Naseema ShafqatDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology Nursing, AIIMS, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Surya BaliDepartment of Community and Family Medicine, AIIMS, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Veena VermaDepartment of Medical Surgical Nursing, AIIMS, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India.
Chitrekha SippyDepartment of Mental Health Nursing, AIIMS, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India.
Jisa T GeorgeDepartment of Medical Surgical Nursing, AIIMS, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Ranjana VermaDepartment of Medical Surgical Nursing, AIIMS, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic led governments worldwide to priorities vaccine development and distribution. However, vaccine hesitancy among healthcare workers (HCWs) posed a significant challenge. This study aimed to explore the HCWs' knowledge, beliefs, and attitudes towards COVID-19 vaccination in Madhya Pradesh, India, using a mixed-method approach. Materials and Methods: A mixed-methods design was used to collect data from 519 HCWs. Quantitative data were obtained through stratified random sampling via face-to-face or online surveys, while qualitative insights were gathered through purposive sampling for in-depth interviews. Results: The sample primarily consisted of nurses (95%), with roles as vaccinators (86.3%) and coordinators (11%). A large proportion (75.5%) were directly involved in patient care during the pandemic, and 31.6% had previously been diagnosed with COVID-19. Most participants expressed confidence in the vaccine's effectiveness (65.5%) and immunity (71.8%), though 21.6% were skeptical of its necessity and 16% had concerns about its safety. Views on vaccine prioritization and post-vaccination risks varied. Despite these differences, participants generally expressed satisfaction with the vaccination programmed, highlighting the need for transparent communication and addressing safety concerns. Qualitative data revealed the importance of trust in scientific research, professional responsibility, peer influence, and logistical challenges in shaping vaccine attitudes. Conclusion: The findings emphasize the need for targeted communication strategies to address vaccine hesitancy among HCWs. By considering these complexities, policymakers can develop interventions to increase vaccine uptake and strengthen frontline defenses against future pandemics.

Indexed as

AttitudesCOVID-19 vaccineshealthcare workersknowledgemixed methods researchpracticevaccination acceptance

Identifiers

PMID41403496
PMCPMC12705031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.