ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2025
Evaluating the utility of frequent laboratory monitoring among acne patients receiving isotretinoin. A two-center study.
Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Acne vulgaris is a common dermatological disorder with significant sociopsychological impacts. Isotretinoin is the mainstay of treatment for severe cases. Adverse effects, such as liver enzyme elevations and lipid profile changes, are linked to this medication. Despite these risks, the need of monthly laboratory monitoring has been questioned, particularly in healthy individuals without comorbidities. Aim: This study investigates the incidence of laboratory abnormalities and evaluates the clinical utility of frequent monitoring in acne patients on isotretinoin therapy in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Methods: This retrospective study included 265 patients treated with isotretinoin at King Abdulaziz University Hospital and King Fahad General Hospital. Data collected included patient demographics, isotretinoin doses, and laboratory results for liver enzymes, triglycerides (TG), and total cholesterol (TC). Laboratory results were assessed at baseline, after 3 months of treatment, and at the last visit. Statistical analyses included the aligned rank transform ANOVA and Wilcoxon Signed-Rank tests to assess changes in laboratory values over time and their relationship with treatment doses. Results: Our study group had a median age of 24 years, with 70.9% being female participants. Abnormal lab values increased from 11.7% at baseline to 15.8% during treatment and 14.7% at the last visit. The most common abnormality was high TC levels, rising from 6.8% at baseline to 11.7% at the last visit. Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) abnormalities increased from 3.0% at baseline to 4.9% during treatment but decreased to 2.6% at the last visit. Triglyceride abnormalities showed minimal variation, increasing from 1.1% at baseline to 1.9% at the last visit. Changes in ALT and TG levels were dose-dependent, whereas aspartate aminotransferase and TC levels were not significantly influenced by the starting dose. Conclusion: Our research assessed the importance of monthly monitoring of liver function tests and lipid profiles in patients undergoing isotretinoin therapy. The findings emphasize the significance of a personalized monitoring approach. This approach suggests that monthly laboratory testing may only be necessary for a few patients. However, baseline assessments and patient specific follow-ups remain essential.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.