Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41403480›Full record

ReviewJournal of family medicine and primary care2025

Factors that contribute to the successful fabrication of CAD-CAM complete dentures.

Ebrahim Fihaid Alsubaiy

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Ebrahim Fihaid AlsubaiyDepartment of Prosthodontics, King Khalid University, Abha, Asser Province, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Complete denture (CD) fabrication has changed dramatically with the introduction of computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacture (CAD-CAM) technologies. These techniques provide benefits including shorter chair times, better material qualities, and cost effectiveness. This systematic study assessed the variables that affect the successful manufacture of CAD-CAM CDs and examined the results and difficulties that follow. Using a thorough approach based on the patient population, intervention, comparison, and outcome framework, manual mining and citation mining were added to electronic searches performed on Google Scholar and PubMed. Studies and clinical reports assessing the clinical outcomes of CAD-CAM CDs were included. Several factors that might affect the performance of CAD-CAM CDs were examined: bond strength, precision, CAD-CAM polymers, and comparisons between digital and traditional dentures. Also examined were issues and mistakes related to clinical performance, time management, denture tooth features, surface qualities, digital workflow, cleaning processes, burs effects, impression techniques, strength, tissue adaptability, patient satisfaction, and retention. The results showed that, albeit with certain drawbacks, CAD-CAM dentures are stronger, more true to size, and fit better than three dimensionally printed options. Overall, digital dentures, as a potential treatment option, are clinically effective, require fewer visits, and improve patient information management. However, problems including speech problems, medical complications, and cosmetic flaws still exist. Before digital dentures become widely accepted, it is imperative to address these limitations. This study highlights the potential of CAD-CAM CDs and identifies areas for further development in clinical practice, offering insightful information about the present status of the technology.

Indexed as

CAD-CAM polymerscomplete denture fabricationcomputer-aided designcomputer-aided manufacturing

Identifiers

PMID41403480
PMCPMC12705018

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.