SynthesisFrontiers in pharmacology2025
The efficacy and safety of thrombopoietin receptor agonists in solid tumors with chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Synthesis in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Efficacy and Safety of rhIL-11 in the Treatment of Cancer Therapy-Induced Thrombocytopenia: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.Cancer medicine · 2026Article
- Case Report: Persistent severe thrombocytopenia after adjuvant ado-trastuzumab emtansine with sequential bone marrow findings and romiplostim support.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Efficacy of eltrombopag in combination with recombinant human thrombopoietin (rhTPO) for lymphoma patients with chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Case Report: Prolonged thrombocytopenia after chemotherapy in solid tumors requiring long-term thrombopoietin receptor agonist support: a five-patient case series.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The objective of this study was to compare and rank the efficacy and safety of different thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RAs) in the treatment of chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia (CIT) among patients with solid tumors. Methods: PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, MEDLINE, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov, CNKI, Wanfang Database, VIP Database, SinoMed, and China Drug Trials (www.chinadrugtrials.org.cn) were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of TPO-RAs for CIT in solid tumors from the inception to 31 December 2024. The Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment Tool 2 was used for assessing the risk of bias. We performed a random-effects network meta-analysis using STATA 14.0 software. Treatments were ranked according to the surface under the cumulative ranking curve. Confidence of the evidence was assessed using Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis. The study protocol was registered with PROSPERO (number CRD42024612536). Results: A total of eight studies (568 patients) were included. Most RCTs (7/8) showed a low risk of bias. The confidence in evidence was often low or very low. Our network meta-analysis indicates that when compared with placebo, hetrombopag (summary RR 0.45, 95% confidence interval 0.28-0.73) and eltrombopag (0.57, 0.41-0.81) significantly reduced the incidence of chemotherapy dose reduction or delay due to thrombocytopenia. Hetrombopag (0.29, 0.13-0.68) also significantly reduced the platelet transfusions. Eltrombopag had the lowest risk for bleeding event (0.41, 0.13-1.23) and mortality (0.83, 0.48-1.44). There were no significant differences in the risk of adverse events (AEs) between interventions. Hetrombopag (0.37, 0.02-8.68) showed the least risk of thrombosis. According to rankograms, hetrombopag was ranked as the best for reducing the incidence of chemotherapy dose reduction or delay, and platelet transfusions, with the least risk of serious AEs and thrombosis. Eltrombopag carried the least risk of bleeding events and mortality. Conclusion: Our network meta-analysis suggested that based on the limited indirect data, hetrombopag may represent the preferred therapy for avoiding chemotherapy dose reductions or delays and platelet transfusion. Eltrombopag may be considered the preferred therapeutic option for avoiding bleeding events and mortality. Both compounds have acceptable safety profiles. However, larger head-to-head trials are needed to confirm these findings. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42024612536, identfier CRD42024612536.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.