ArticleERJ open research2025
Interpreting respiratory oscillometry in adults with asthma or COPD: findings of an international Delphi study.
Article in ERJ open research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Oscillometry for the diagnosis of asthma in children: a systematic review.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2026Pooled it
- Respiratory oscillometry in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with airway mucus plugs: insights from the ECLIPSE study.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2026Article
- Respiratory Oscillometry Findings in Chronic Epipharyngitis.Reports (MDPI) · 2026Article
- Current use and future potential of oscillometry in UK lung function testing: a national survey.BMJ open respiratory research · 2026Article
- Association between impulse oscillometry Z-scores and asthma control and exacerbation risk in a tertiary severe asthma clinic.Frontiers in allergy · 2026Article
- Small airway dysfunction: a shared, early, measurable, and potentially treatable trait across COPD, asthma, and fibrotic lung disease.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Respiratory oscillometry measures the physiological effort and mechanics of moving air in and out of the lungs during normal breathing. It provides complementary information to spirometry. Uncertainty regarding the interpretation of oscillometry is a barrier to routine use. The aim of this study was to aid in oscillometry interpretation among adults with asthma or COPD by generating expert consensus statements. Methods: A Delphi method was used to develop consensus statements regarding the clinical use of oscillometry in adults to identify abnormal lung function, bronchodilator response and minimal clinically important differences. Initial statements were refined in the brainstorming round. Statements were assessed by 60 pulmonologists over three rounds, with consensus defined as ≥70% agreement. Results: Pulmonologists agreed that oscillometry is clinically useful to assess abnormal lung function and its severity, and to measure bronchodilator response. High consensus was reached for resistance at 5 Hz ( Discussion: This international Delphi study combined evidence-based and expert opinion to inform clinicians in the interpretation of respiratory oscillometry. Focusing on a few key parameters of oscillometry will allow clinicians to become confident in its everyday use to assess abnormal lung function, grade severity of impairment, monitor progression over time and assess bronchodilator response.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.