ArticleEpilepsy & behavior reports2025
Early antiseizure response to cenobamate (200 mg/day) in focal drug-resistant epilepsy: a retrospective single-center analysis.
Article in Epilepsy & behavior reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Clinical studies have shown cenobamate (CNB) is effective for treating drug-resistant focal epilepsy. This study examines Polish patients with epilepsy, assessing the efficacy and safety of CNB at 200 mg/day and factors influencing early therapeutic response. A retrospective observational study involved 100 patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy, treated in a private Polish epilepsy outpatient clinic from March 2022 to March 2025. The primary goal was to evaluate response to CNB 200 mg/day, using seizure reduction thresholds (50 %, 75 %, 100 %), and to identify determinants such as demographic data, disease duration and etiology, intellectual disability, baseline seizure frequency, previous antiseizure medications (ASMs) and medication combinations. Adverse reactions and changes in concomitant ASMs were also evaluated. Of the 100 patients, 95 continued CNB therapy. Most had multi-drug resistance. After three months at 200 mg/day, ≥50 % seizure reduction was seen in 63 %, ≥75 % in 36 %, and 100 % in 18 %. Age, sex, epilepsy etiology or duration, intellectual disability, prior seizure count, previous ASMs, and medication combinations did not affect CNB's efficacy. Most tolerated CNB well, with adverse effects including dizziness and balance disorders (49 %), somnolence (38 %), diplopia (17 %), weakness (10 %), and concentration or memory issues (10 %). Lacosamide use increased adverse effects, which mostly resolved after dose reduction. Other adjusted drugs were lamotrigine, topiramate, and oxcarbazepine. CNB at 200 mg/day was highly effective and generally well-tolerated, especially with reduced doses of other ASMs. Efficacy was independent of epilepsy severity or treatment factors, suggesting CNB's promise in multi-drug-resistant patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.