Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41403399›Full record

ReviewJAR life2026

Flavour perception in Alzheimer's disease: A systematic review of olfactory and gustatory assessment methods.

Danel Ushkempirova, Louise Davis, Alan Chalmers

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in JAR life, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Danel UshkempirovaWarwick Manufacturing Group, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK.
Louise DavisWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK.
Alan ChalmersWarwick Manufacturing Group, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Disruptions in flavour perception, due to olfactory dysfunction and gustatory dysfunction, may serve as early indicators of Alzheimer's disease and contribute to reduced quality of life. Flavour perception is a multisensory process, yet no standardised tools currently exist to assess it comprehensively in Alzheimer's disease. This systematic review examined current olfactory and gustatory assessments used to evaluate flavour function in individuals with Alzheimer's. Six studies met the inclusion criteria, encompassing 471 participants, including 161 with Alzheimer's. Olfactory function was most often assessed with the Sniffin' Sticks test, while gustatory function was typically evaluated using Taste Strips. While olfactory dysfunction was consistently reported across studies, evidence for gustatory impairment was less uniform, reflecting methodological variability in taste assessment procedures. Only one study used a culturally adapted test, and none assessed umami. However, the small number of studies, heterogeneity in methodology, and limited cultural adaptation constrain the generalisability of these findings. These findings highlight the need for a culturally adaptable, combined flavour assessment tool that minimises cognitive and linguistic demands to support early detection and monitoring of Alzheimer's disease.

Indexed as

Alzheimer's diseaseFlavour assessmentGustatory dysfunctionOlfactory dysfunctionSmell testTaste test

Identifiers

PMID41403399
PMCPMC12704087

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.