Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41403386›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics2026

Safeguarding maternal health against extreme heat in India: A policy analysis of state-level heat action plans.

Gabriela De Jesus Cipriano Flores, Surya Surendran, Karthika Kumar, Devaki Nambiar, Jane E Hirst

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Safeguarding maternal health against extreme heat in India: A policy analysis of state-level heat action plans.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Gabriela De Jesus Cipriano FloresThe George Institute for Global Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7562-7540
Surya SurendranThe George Institute for Global Health, Delhi, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7272-0910
Karthika KumarThe George Institute for Global Health, Delhi, India.
Devaki NambiarThe George Institute for Global Health, Delhi, India.
Jane E HirstThe George Institute for Global Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0176-2651

Funding

Wellcome Trust 227191/Z/23/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study identifies and characterizes policy measures across Indian states to protect pregnant and lactating women from extreme heat exposure through a thematic analysis of state-level heat and climate adaptation plans.

methodsUsing content analysis, we systematically reviewed publicly available Heat Action Plans (HAPs) (N = 19) and, when unavailable, the State Action Plan on Climate Change (N = 16) from all Indian states and union territories. Strategies referencing pregnant and lactating women, either directly or indirectly (i.e., as part of a group identified as vulnerable), were extracted, categorized and coded.

resultsTwelve of 35 state plans (33%) contained no recommendations for pregnant or lactating women. The remaining 23 plans listed 214 strategies, comprising 102 unique strategies (no repetitions). However, only 40 directly addressed this group. Karnataka (16), Telangana (11), and Delhi (10) had the highest number of unique strategies. Strategies were categorized using the four-category climate adaptation framework of Chersich et al. and fell into behavior change actions (n = 100), structural/policy, and climate-financing support measures (n = 51), health system interventions (n = 38), and built environment/cooling solutions (n = 25).

conclusionStrategies specifically addressing pregnant and lactating women during extreme heat remain limited across Indian states, with most focusing on behavioral interventions rather than structural solutions. Critical gaps exist in 12 states with no targeted measures. Very few strategies focus on pregnant and lactating women in the HAPs. Strengthening evidence-based, targeted adaptation policies and implementing comprehensive structural interventions are critical to protecting them from the increasing heat exposure risks.

Indexed as

Extreme HeatHealth PolicyMaternal HealthClimate ChangeFemaleHumansIndiaLactationPolicy MakingPregnancyclimate changeheatIndialactationmotherspolicypregnancytemperature

Identifiers

PMID41403386
PMCPMC13173611

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.