Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41403326›Full record

ArticleJournal of anatomy2026

Do plantar calcaneal spurs make the plantar aponeurosis enthesis stronger? A biomechanical analysis.

Joanna Tomlinson, Kai Chun Li, Johann Zwirner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of anatomy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Joanna TomlinsonSchool of Anatomy, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Kai Chun LiDepartment of Oral Rehabilitation, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Johann ZwirnerInstitute of Legal Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3560-3915

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Calcaneal spurs are shown to be increasingly prevalent in modern populations and often contribute to forming heel and foot pain. There are multiple hypotheses for their formation, including exercise, prolonged standing and obesity. The impact of these spurs on foot biomechanics remains unclear; it is suggested that their presence may contribute to enthesial avulsion forces. This study aimed to determine the avulsion properties of the plantar aponeurosis enthesis with and without spurs. Twenty-four feet from 15 cadavers donated to the Department of Anatomy at the University of Otago were used for this study. Tissues were X-rayed to determine the presence of spurs. The donor feet were dissected to isolate the calcanei. These were then mounted in a custom-developed 3D-printed clamping rig to perform tensile testing of the plantar calcaneal enthesis to determine pull-out forces of the central band of the plantar fascia. Biomechanical testing showed no statistically significant differences in avulsion properties between the spur (n = 7) and non-spur (n = 14) samples in any of the avulsion parameters investigated: F

Indexed as

AponeurosisCalcaneusHeel SpurAgedAged, 80 and overBiomechanical PhenomenaCadaverFemaleHumansMaleMiddle Agedavulsion parameterscalcaneusenthesisplantar spurspull‐out force

Identifiers

PMID41403326
PMCPMC13140618

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.