Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41403185›Full record

ArticleSocial studies of science2026

Techno-Fixes: On the Non-Disruptive Disruptions of Cultured Meat, Social Freezing and AI Assistants.

Henning Laux, Sandra Matthäus, Clara Wieghorst, Philipp Zeltner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Social studies of science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Henning LauxLeibniz Center for Science and Society, Leibniz University Hannover, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4846-5013
Sandra MatthäusArbeitsbereich Soziologische Theorien, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Germany.ORCID 0009-0001-2015-6796
Clara WieghorstLeibniz Center for Science and Society, Leibniz University Hannover, Germany.
Philipp ZeltnerProjektträger Jülich, Bioökonomie, Forschungszentrum Jülich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4763-1788

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is an ongoing debate about the capacity of technologies to solve social problems. In this article, we analyze the sociomaterial scripts of three techno-fixes: cultured meat, social egg freezing, and AI assistants. Using a mix of ethnography, interviews, and discourse analysis, our case studies arrive at three findings. First, techno-fixes do not lead to a world with blurred boundaries and hybrid entities. On the contrary, clear images of nature, society, and technology serve as valuable resources in innovation processes. Second, technical solutions are based on three incompatible scripts. This makes it possible to revolutionize and save the world without changing it. We use the term

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceIn Vitro MeatAnimalsCryopreservationFreezingHumansAI assistantcultured meategg freezingnon-disruptive disruptionscripttechno-fix

Identifiers

PMID41403185
PMCPMC13242525

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.