Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41403174›Full record

ArticleTransplant infectious disease : an official journal of the Transplantation Society

International Survey on Antibiotic Prophylaxis Approaches for Solid Organ Transplant Recipients and Donors Colonized With Multidrug-Resistant Organisms.

Julia Bini Viotti, Stephanie M Pouch, Maddalena Giannella, Monica Slavin, John W Baddley, Ricardo M La Hoz, Ligia Camera Pierrotti, Wanessa Trindade Clemente, Lilian M Abbo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Transplant infectious disease : an official journal of the Transplantation Society. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Julia Bini ViottiUniversity of Miami, Miami, Florida, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8145-9440
Stephanie M PouchEmory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5628-2444
Maddalena GiannellaIRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Monica SlavinUniversity of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
John W BaddleyJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9111-625X
Ricardo M La HozUniversity of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1560-3192
Ligia Camera PierrottiUniversidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Wanessa Trindade ClementeUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0848-3740
Lilian M AbboUniversity of Miami, Miami, Florida, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMultidrug-resistant organism colonization and infections cause significant morbidity and mortality in solid organ transplantation, affecting the perioperative antibiotic management. Yet, international practices for screening and antibiotic prophylaxis in colonized donors and recipients remain poorly defined.

methodsSelf-administered, web-based survey conducted between February and July 2025 to assess global practices in multidrug-resistant organism screening and perioperative antibiotic management in SOT, developed by transplant infectious diseases experts and endorsed by the Transplant Infectious Diseases Section of the Transplantation Society and the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Study Group for Infections in Compromised Hosts. Data collected included respondent and institution characteristics; screening and prophylaxis protocols; donor and recipient colonization management; and timeframes relevant for prophylaxis modification.

resultsResponses from 125 transplant centers across 24 countries and four continents were included. Most respondents were infectious disease physicians (73.6%). Antimicrobial stewardship programs and transplant infectious diseases consultation were available in 93.6% and 85.6% of centers, respectively. Over half (52.0%) modified prophylaxis based on donor multidrug-resistant organism colonization, mainly triggered by urine and respiratory cultures. Preservation fluid and surveillance cultures influenced decisions less often. Recipient screening protocols were reported by 61.6% of centers, primarily targeting carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (80.8%). About 41.6% routinely adjusted prophylaxis for colonized recipients, especially with recent (1-3 months) colonization.

conclusionSubstantial international variability exists in multidrug-resistant organism screening and perioperative prophylaxis practices in solid organ transplantation. Evidence-based consensus guidelines are needed to standardize and improve prevention of donor-derived and recipient infections globally.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsAntibiotic ProphylaxisDrug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialOrgan TransplantationTissue DonorsTransplant RecipientsAntimicrobial StewardshipHumansSurveys and QuestionnairesAnti-Bacterial Agentsantibiotic prophylaxiscolonizationmultidrug resistant bacteriasolid organ transplantsurvey

Identifiers

PMID41403174
PMCPMC12892828

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.