Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41402968›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being2025

Fragmentation of healthcare systems: challenges through patients' eyes.

Dunia Ghannam, Nathalie Angelé-Halgand, Michèle Kosremelli-Asmar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Dunia GhannamLebanese University, Beirut, Lebanon.ORCID 0009-0005-0533-942X
Nathalie Angelé-HalgandSherbrooke University, Sherbooke, Canada.
Michèle Kosremelli-AsmarSaint-Joseph University, Beirut, Lebanon.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThis article aims to identify key challenges raised by fragmented healthcare systems by adopting the lens of patients. We analyzed how high fragmentation leads to the loss of humanity from healthcare providers as perceived by the parents of children born with disabilities.

methodsTwenty-nine Lebanese families of children born with disability agreed to participate. Data was collected through semi-structured interviews, recorded and then coded using Nvivo 11. The coding followed an abductive approach. RESULTS AND CONTRIBUTION: The study revealed the financial and bureaucratic burdens, the reification and relational challenges of fragmented healthcare systems. We identified how parents became an expert patient and a care path manager. Our contribution is by addressing the fragmentation issue from the parents' point of view. In this way, we further contribute to documenting the impact of fragmentation, on the lives of patients and their families and the intensity of the violence generated by the institutional system that amplifies the trauma inherent to the clinical case which refers to the chronic emotional and psychological distress that parents endure as they repeatedly confront care discontinuities, administrative barriers, and the need to compensate for the system's failures.

Indexed as

Children with DisabilitiesDelivery of Health CareParentsAdultChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicLebanonMaleQualitative Researchcare pathdisabilityexpert patienthealthcare systemprivatizationReification

Identifiers

PMID41402968
PMCPMC12713217

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.